Skip to main content
· 9/20/2006

R.M. Stark & Co. v. Noddle

Citations

  • 941 So. 2d 401
  • 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15512
  • 2006 WL 2683210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • use of original docket number in re-served process did not create jurisdictional defect because ‘‘the trial court could have ordered the clerk to assign a new docket number to the re-served process’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polen, Stevenson, Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.