R.M. Smith v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Renee M. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Sherman Act does not apply to “the NCAA’s promulgation of eligibility requirements” be- cause they “primarily seek to ensure fair competition in inter- collegiate athletics”
• holding that the Sherman Act does not apply to “the NCAA’s promulgation of eligibility requirements” be- cause they “primarily seek to ensure fair competition in inter- collegiate athletics”
• holding that the Sherman Act does not apply to “the NCAA’s promulgation of eligibility requirements” be- cause they “primarily seek to ensure fair competition in inter- collegiate athletics”
• holding that the Sherman Act does not apply to “the NCAA’s promulgation of eligibility requirements” be- cause they “primarily seek to ensure fair competition in inter- collegiate athletics”
• holding that the Sherman Act does not apply to “the NCAA’s promulgation of eligibility requirements” be- cause they “primarily seek to ensure fair competition in inter- collegiate athletics”
• noting that the rule discouraged students from foregoing participation in athletics at their undergraduate institutions in order to preserve their eligibility at the postgraduate level and prevented graduate schools from inducing such behavior

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).