Skip to main content
· 10/7/2002

Rk Ventures, Inc. v. City Of Seattle

Citations

  • 307 F.3d 1045
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10186
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 11717
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the statute of limitations runs separately from each discrete act”
  • explaining that a § 1983 claim accrues “when 2 the plaintiffs know or have reason to know of the injury that is the basis of the action”
  • “[A] claim 3 of malicious prosecution does not accrue until the plaintiff is acquitted, because acquittal 4 is an element of the claim.”
  • “In general, shareholders lack standing to 20 assert an individual § 1983 claim based on harm to the corporation in which they own 21 shares.”
  • “[P]laintiffs who are not members of the protected class have standing to challenge racially discriminatory conduct in their own right when they are the direct target of the discrimination.”
  • “But plaintiffs who are not members of the protected class have standing to challenge racially discriminatory conduct in their own right when they are the direct target of the discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.