Skip to main content
· 1/29/1999

R.J.M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

Citations

  • 973 P.2d 79
  • 1999 Alas. LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although the superior court could have considered [new evidence] [on remand], it did not abuse its discretion in not doing so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.