RJC Midwest, LP v. Fernando Canales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying defendant’s motive as relevant to the sufficiency of the evidence
• “Summary charts are permitted generally by Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 and the decision whether to use them lies within the district court’s discretion.”
• Under Rule 1006, “the essential requirement is not that the [summary] be free from reliance on any assumptions, but rather that these assumptions be supported by evidence in the record.”
• “[T]he jury also could have seen pre-prepping as a sign of Melgen’s willful choice to treat the vast majority of his patients for ARMD, whether or not it was medically necessary.”
• applying this rule in a Medicare fraud case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).