R.J. v. State Department of Human Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that even where state law permits alternative theories of relief, once court determines that valid, express contract governs subject matter of parties’ dispute, there can be no recovery under unjust- enrichment claim
• noting the supreme court’s decision “will be binding on our court”
• reaching a similar conclusion at the motion to dismiss stage
• “Parol evidence is admissible to elucidate latent contractual ambiguities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).