Skip to main content
· 11/7/2018

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. GWENDOLYN ODOM, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Our decision in Otto Roth does not require a party to establish proprietary rights in a mark in order to meet the statutory requirements to chal- lenge a mark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.