Rizzotto v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the district court’s role in implementing a mandate as “a shared responsibility” with the court of appeals
• “[CJlaims for reimbursed allowances for post exchange and commissary privileges ... appear to be speculative in amount, hence should not have awarded.”
• “Faced with the district court’s apparent uncertainty concerning our mandate, and the plainly erroneous interpretation of the Army, we would be remiss were we to abandon our decision that we reached in the appellants’ favor”
• original panel recalled and clarified mandate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).