Rivnak v. Rivnak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a]nalysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “[a]nalysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• courts may assign liabilities based on parties’ respective ownership of each debt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Auerbach v. Auerbach
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-03-24· cited 28×
• Macellaio v. Newington Police Department
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-09-03· cited 27×
• State v. Gonzalez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-11· cited 22×
• Desai v. Desai
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-02· cited 18×
• Rozsa v. Rozsa
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-09-08· cited 16×
• McMellon v. McMellon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-08-11· cited 11×
• O'Connell v. O'Connell
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-05· cited 9×
• Conservation Com'n of Fairfield v. Red 11
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-16· cited 8×
• Cunningham v. Cunningham
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-02-12· cited 7×
• Radcliffe v. Radcliffe
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-07-08· cited 5×
• Bove v. Bove
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-21· cited 5×
• Raffone v. INDUSTRIAL ACCEPTANCE CORP.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-09· cited 3×
• Lynn v. Lynn
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-08-13· cited 3×
• Marmo v. Marmo
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-30
• Cimino v. Cimino
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-02-03
• Havis-Carbone v. Carbone
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-03-17