Riverside Water Co. v. Gage
Citations
- 89 Cal. 410
- 26 P. 889
- 1891 Cal. LEXIS 829
Syllabus
<p>Water Rights — Action to Determine Adverse Claim —Pleading — Ownership — Diversion of Part. —In an action to determine the adverse rights of the parties to the waters of a stream, where the complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of and entitled to the use of all the water at the point where the defendant’s dam was erected, in excess of 200 inches, an allegation that the plaintiff has been deprived of the use and enjoyment of upwards of 450 inches of water hy the acts of the defendant in erecting the dam does not limit the plaintiff’s claim to the 450 inches, or in any manner qualify the allegation that the plaintiff owns all the water in excess of 201) inches.</p> <p>Id. — Ownership of Corpus of Water— Right of Use — Finding. — The rule that an appropriator of water does not become the owner of the very body of the water as his personal property, until he has acquired the control of it in conduits or reservoirs of his own, does not apply where the plaintiff is not seeking to recover the value of water which had become his personal property, but is seeking the determination of the adverse claim of the defendant of the right to divert and use a portion of it; and a finding in such action that the plaintiff is the owner and has the right to the use of all the water flowing in the stream at the defendant’s dam in excess of a certain quantity is not in con diet with such rule.</p> <p>Id.—Findings — Matter Outside of Issues —Prescriptive Right — Riparian Right — Statute of Limitations. — Where the complaint alleged ownership and right of use in a certain portion of the waters of a river, an adverse and unfounded claim by the defendant to and a wrongful diversion of a portion of the water, and the answer admitted the defendant’s adverse claim, alleged that it was valid, and denied the wrongful diversion, and the findings on the issues raised are as broad and specific as the pleadings themselves, and contain everything necessary to support the judgment, findin
Judges: Beatty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.