Riverside South Planning Corp. v. CRP/Extell Riverside, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plain language of a contract’s sunset clause applied to the entire agreement when “the parties could have drafted an agreement that restricted the scope of the sunset clause” but declined to do so
• noting that New York courts construe contracts holistically, rather than taking each term in isolation
• “Where the language chosen by the parties has a definite and precise meaning, there is no ambiguity.”
• “A written contract must be interpreted according to the parties’ intent, which is derived from the plain meaning of the language employed in the agreements.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).