Skip to main content
· 11/10/1886

Riverside Co. v. Townshend

Citations

  • 120 Ill. 9

Syllabus

<p>1. Setting aside tax deed—reimbursing claimant under tax deed for taxes, etc., paid—in what proceeding—prospective operation of the statute. The proviso to section 224 of the Revenue act, in force July 1,1885, requiring any judgment or decree of court setting aside a tax deed, to provide that the claimant shall pay the holder of such deed all taxes, legal costs, etc., paid by such holder or his assignors, has no application to an action of ejectment against the holder of a tax title, hut relates to equitable proceedings instituted for the purpose of setting aside tax deeds. It was not the purpose of the statute to change the action of ejectment into a chancery proceeding, or to confer any new or enlarged jurisdiction upon courts of-law.</p> <p>2. Same—impairing vested rights. Nor was it the design, by that section of .the statute, to change or affect the vested rights of others. The legislature has not the power to deprive a party of a vested right, or to say that a vested right, which is absolute and unconditional, shall only be exercised upon certain conditions imposed by itself. So where it has been adjudicated that a certain tax deed is invalid, and unavailing as a defence in an action of ejectment, no subsequent legislation can operate to impair the right of the plaintiff in the ejectment suit to the protection of that ruling.</p> <p>3. Formeb adjudication—whether a bar to a subsequent suit, generally. A judgment upon the merits is an absolute bar to a subsequent action upon the same claim or cause of action, not only as to every matter which was offered and considered to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose.</p> <p>4. But when the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue, or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdic

Judges: Magruder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.