· 8/11/1997
Rivers v. Walt Disney Co.
Citations
- 980 F. Supp. 1358
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 13950
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16392
- 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,091
- 1997 WL 655944
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that a majority of courts have reached this conclusion
- granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a majority of courts have concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial proceedings while a motion to transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”
- granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a majority of courts have concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial proceedings while a motion to transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”
- granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a 5 majority of courts have concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial 6 proceedings while a motion to transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”
- granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a majority of courts have 6 concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial proceedings while a motion to 7 transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”
- granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a majority of courts have 4 concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial proceedings while a motion to 5 transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hauk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.