Skip to main content
· 8/11/1997

Rivers v. Walt Disney Co.

Citations

  • 980 F. Supp. 1358
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 13950
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16392
  • 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,091
  • 1997 WL 655944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a majority of courts have reached this conclusion
  • granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a majority of courts have concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial proceedings while a motion to transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”
  • granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a majority of courts have concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial proceedings while a motion to transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”
  • granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a 5 majority of courts have concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial 6 proceedings while a motion to transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”
  • granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a majority of courts have 6 concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial proceedings while a motion to 7 transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”
  • granting stay pending JPML’s ruling because “a majority of courts have 4 concluded that it is often appropriate to stay preliminary pretrial proceedings while a motion to 5 transfer and consolidate is pending with the MDL Panel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hauk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.