Rivers v. Pennsylvania Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that D’Oench, Duhme cannot be used to satisfy the § 523(a)(2)(B) reliance requirement absent evidence of collusion or an agreement between the debtor and the bank

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).