Riverdale Mills Corp. v. Pimpare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the second and third questions this circuit usually asks involve an expansion of the inquiry prescribed by the Supreme Court
• finding qualified immunity on the first prong, not on the question of Fourth Amendment reasonableness, but on the antecedent question of law as to whether there had been a “search”
• \The district court below erred by posing the second prong as whether 'the law regarding the necessity for a search warrant is clear.'\
• “Riverdale has abandoned any reasonable expectation of privacy in the wastewater by allowing it to flow irretrievably into a place where it will be ‘exposed ... to the public.’”
• \Riverdale has abandoned any reasonable expectation of privacy in the wastewater by allowing it to flow irretrievably into a place where it will be 'exposed ... to the public.' \
• guoting Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 202 (2001)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).