Rivera v. Washington Mutual Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a similarly unsupported allegation of excessive interest charges failed to plead a violation of law
• dismissing TCCWNA claim where “Plaintiffs have not identified which provisions of either document allegedly violate a clearly established right of Plaintiff[] or responsibility of [Lender]’
• “[T]here is no independent private right of action to remedy violations of New Jersey Court Rules.” (citing Whittingham v. Amended Mortg. Elec. Registration Servs., No. 06-3016, 2007 WL 1456196, at (D.N.J. May 15, 2007)
• “[I]t is axiomatic that a plaintiff may not recover for emotional distress caused by a defendants’ alleged breach of contract; such a proposition lies at the heart of the economic loss doctrine.” (citing Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 353 (1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).