Skip to main content

Rivera v. State

Citations

  • 808 S.W.2d 80
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 31
  • 1991 WL 18740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The State need neither plead nor prove a burglar's intent to commit a felony or theft upon entry under (a)(3) of V.T.C.A Penal Code 30.02.\
  • State is not required to prove that Appellant intended to commit theft when he entered the habitation
  • jailhouse statements considered as part of sufficiency of evidence challenge
  • jailhouse statements considered as part of sufficiency of evidence challenge
  • the prosecution has no general duty to disclose inculpatory evidence
  • “[I]n this case, there was no violation of the rule because the evidence showed that the Deuchers had not yet come forward on the first day of trial; they were not known to be witnesses, and were not covered by the invocation of the rule on the first day.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Teague, Overstreet, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.