Rivera v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issue was not preserved for review where defendant failed to raise a contemporaneous objection when the trial court announced it was imposing costs of prosecution
• holding rule 3.800(b)(2) motion will not preserve imposition of prosecution costs for review where the trial court orally pronounces them
• recognizing that written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rivera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-10· cited 16×
• Vick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-16· cited 8×
• Bryant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-17· cited 5×
• Carlton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-27· cited 4×
• Torres v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-20· cited 3×
• Holmes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-30· cited 1×
• Gay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-15· cited 1×
• Mubarak Qureshi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-19
• Lollis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-10
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. CHRISTOPHE A. CREMERS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-03-03
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. CHRISTOPHE A. CREMERS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-04-28
• Alexis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-26
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-30