Rivera v. Gagnon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a contract “must be viewed in its entirety, and the contract terms must be assigned their plain and ordinary meanings”
• \An agreement containing a mutual mistake fails in a material respect correctly to reflect the understanding of both parties.\
• “[I]t is well established that a document must be viewed in its entirety * * *.”
• “If the contract terms are clear and unambiguous, judicial construction is at an end for the terms will be applied as written.”
• “If the contract terms are clear and unambiguous, judicial construction is at an end for the terms will be applied as written.”
• footnote omitted, emphasis provided except where indicated above in original text

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).