Rivera v. Flav-O-Rich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that there is \no reason to preclude the best and most just decision even if it results in the combined utilization of civil-law and common-law techniques\
• expressing doubts whether an unsworn declaration of a Panamanian attorney “who stated, with no substantiation or citation of Panamanian legal authority, that the Panamanian court would take jurisdiction of the case” was sufficient
• \The essential difference [between civil-law and common-law methodology] may merely relate to the degree of sanctity with which precedents are regarded.\
• “The essential difference [between civil-law and common-law methodology] may merely relate to the degree of sanctity with which precedents are regarded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).