Rivera-Padilla v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the custodial interrogation exception “clearly ha[d] no application” to the defendant’s interview with the Virginia Department of Social Services concerning her eligibility for public benefits
• noting that the custodial interrogation exception “clearly ha[d] no application” to the defendant’s interview with the Virginia Department of Social Services concerning her eligibility for public benefits
• “[T]he issue is not whether [the defendant] was compelled to attend the meeting with DSS and answer questions in order to claim benefits, but whether she was coerced to surrender her privilege to claim benefits.”
• “[T]he issue is not whether [the defendant] was compelled to attend the meeting with DSS and answer questions in order to claim benefits, but whether she was coerced to surrender her privilege to claim benefits.”
• “[T]he issue is not whether [the defendant] was compelled to attend the meeting with DSS and answer questions in order to claim benefits, but whether she was coerced to surrender her privilege to claim benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).