Rivera Hernandez, Jacklyn v. Roque Ocasio, Josue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Crenshaw held that “neither the tenure nor salary of federal officers is constitutionally protected from impairment by Congress”
• adjudicating challenge to conviction on ground that the judge allegedly did not hold office validly under Article III of the Constitution
• reviewing whether the plaintiffs' cases could be adjudicated by judges designated from non-Article III courts
• reviewing whether the plaintiffs’ cases could be adjudicated by judges designated from non-Article III courts
• including Appointments Clause objections to judicial officers in the category of nonjurisdictional structural constitutional objections
• noting \this Court's considered practice not to apply stare decisis as rigidly in constitutional as in nonconstitutional cases\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).