River Plantation Homeowner's Association, Inc. v. R. Randall Capps

Syllabus

This appeal arises from a lawsuit concerning the enforcement of restrictive covenants in a subdivision. River Plantation Homeowner's Association, Inc. (\the Association\), later joined by certain individual property owners (\Plaintiffs\ collectively), sued property owners R. Randall Capps and his wife Carolyn Brown Capps (\the Capps\) in the Chancery Court for Greene County (\the Trial Court\) seeking enforcement of a restrictive covenant requiring homeowners to have a paved driveway. The Capps have a gravel driveway and wish to keep it. The Trial Court found in favor of Plaintiffs and ordered the Capps to install a concrete driveway. The Capps appeal, raising several issues, including one as to whether the Association lacks standing. We hold, inter alia, that the Association, although not specified in the restrictive covenants as a party capable of suing to enforce restrictions, has standing to do so. In light of the unambiguous driveway restriction and the fact that the Association never waived enforcement, we affirm the Trial Court's judgment in favor of Plaintiffs. However, we modify the Trial Court's judgment to allow the Capps, if they so choose, to use asphalt instead of concrete, as the Association has no objection to it. In addition, we reverse the Trial Court's decision to not award Plaintiffs their attorney's fees incurred in successfully bringing this enforcement action where the restrictive covenants specifically provide for such attorney's fees. We, therefore, remand for the determination and award to Plaintiffs of reasonable attorney's fees. Otherwise, we affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.