Rivas v. Seward Park Hous. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state court exercising jurisdiction over suit arising from collective bargaining agreement must apply federal common law
• holding that incompatible doctrines of local law must give way to principles of federal labor law
• holding that a state court, exercising jurisdiction over suit arising from collective bargaining agreement must apply federal common law
• holding that Section 301 claims may be adjudicated in state courts, but that those courts must apply federal common law
• holding that state court with jurisdiction over § 301 claim should have applied federal labor law rather than state contract law
• holding that Section 301 preempts state law claims because “Congress intended doctrines of federal labor law uniformly to prevail over inconsistent local rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).