Rivas-Rosado v. Radio Shack, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the same is true in sex discrimination under Title VII where the plaintiff and alleged discriminator are,different sexes
• noting that Title VII does not ensure against inaccuracy by an employer, only gender-based discrimination
• affirming grant of summary judgment on disparate treatment claim where there was no reason to believe reason for termination was pretextual
• rejecting differential treatment argument in part because contrary to plaintiff, purported comparators did not benefit personally from irregularities leading to plaintiffs termination
• “mere fact that decisionmakers were male does not alone, absent other evidence, create an inference that they engaged in gender discrimination”
• departures from normal company procedure, a number of which appeared to work to plaintiffs benefit such as falsifying records to earn higher commissions, acknowledged as valid, nondiscriminatory reasons for termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).