Riumbau v. Colodner (In Re Colodner)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting a motion to dismiss where “[t]he complaint fail[ed] to specify any assets belonging to the debtor which were either lost or which were diminished and for which the debtor has failed to give a satisfactory explanation”
• dismissing a complaint that failed to “allege the diminution or loss of any of the debtor's assets or that the debtor has failed to give a satisfactory explanation for the deficiency or loss of any of his assets”
• \creditor must allege and prove that the debtor no longer has assets which the debtor previously owned and that the debtor has failed to explain the loss\
• “Generally, the wrongful acts proscribed under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4) are parallel to the actions that are defined as bankruptcy crimes. See 18 U.S.C. § 152.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).