Ritter v. Ritter
Citations
- 2024 ND 147
Syllabus
A trial court's property valuations and division of the parties' assets and debts, and refinancing of debts are findings of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. A trial court may weigh spouses' competing testimony on the value of marital property. A trial court's valuation of marital property is not clearly erroneous if the findings are within the range of evidence provided. Whether a trial court includes an indemnity provision in a divorce judgment is dependent upon the facts of the case, subject to the clearly erroneous standard. When determining whether to award spousal support, the trial court must consider the Ruff-Fischer guidelines, the needs of the spouse seeking support, and the ability of the other spouse to pay. Under the child support guidelines, a district court may average an obligor's income when calculating his or her income for child support purposes if the obligor has a fluctuating income. The guidelines specifically provide where gross income is subject to fluctuation, information reflecting and covering a period of time sufficient to reveal the likely extent of fluctuations must be provided.
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schiff v. SchiffNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-05-25· cited 45×
- Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-02-23· cited 44×
- Lorenz v. LorenzNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-04-10· cited 43×
- Pearson v. PearsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-08-18· cited 29×
- Willprecht v. WillprechtNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-04-06· cited 25×
- Halberg v. HalbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-01-26· cited 24×
- Orwig v. OrwigNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-02-18· cited 24×
- Braun v. BraunNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-05-31· cited 23×
- Thompson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-06-05· cited 17×
- Innis-Smith v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-01-26· cited 15×
- Quamme v. QuammeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-12-01· cited 15×
- Tarver v. TarverNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-07-11· cited 14×
- Langwald v. LangwaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-04-15· cited 13×
- Willprecht v. WillprechtNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-02-18· cited 9×
- Updike v. UpdikeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-05-12· cited 7×
- Williams v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-12-15· cited 6×
- Recovery Resources, LLC v. CupidoNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-07-12· cited 4×
- Anderson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-05-09· cited 4×
- Otten v. OttenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-07-19· cited 4×
- Ritter v. RitterNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-07-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.