Rittenberry v. Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a servicer is not a creditor under TILA’s definition and therefore not subject to the disclosure requirements of 12 C.F.R. § 226.17
• granting motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction where plaintiff's allegations of control by one entity of another were speculative
• “Plaintiffs also attempt to show good cause for joining Wells Fargo Bank to this action by designating it a ‘necessary party’ under Rule 19.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).