RITONDO BY RITONDO v. Pekala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a medical expert's complete \negation of his direct testimony was a clear and unequivocal withdrawal of his opinion\
• affirming order granting a Rule 4:37-2(b) dismissal motion made before the end of the plaintiff's case but after the plaintiff's sole expert witness on the standard of care had failed to support plaintiff's case in his testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).