Ritland v. Rowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a substantial question exists regarding which limiting statute should apply, a district court should, in accordance with public policy, resolve any doubt in favor of the statute containing the longer limitation
• applying the three-year statute of limitation for negligence claims when the damages are to property rather than the two-year statute of limitation for property damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).