Ritchie v. Konrad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a protection order may be renewed permanently upon a finding of a “reasonable apprehension of future abuse” and squarely rejecting an “imminent danger” standard because it would fall short of fulfilling the statute’s purpose of preventing future acts of abuse
• “We conclude that in California, as in the rest of the country, an objective test must be satisfied before a protective order is renewed in contested cases.”
• “We conclude that in California, as in the rest of the country, an objective test must be satisfied before a protective order is renewed in contested cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).