Ritchie Thomas, Jr. v. Tyesha Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff was required to provide “a more detailed description of the specific falsehoods that are the basis for his suit”
• holding that the plaintiff was required to provide “a more detailed description of the specific falsehoods that are the basis for his suit”
• holding that the FCA “attaches liability [] not to underlying fraudulent activity, but to the claim for payment”
• holding that “because the False Claims Act is self-evidently an 6 anti-fraud statute, complaints brought under it must comply with Rule 9(b)”
• finding that the relator had not alleged that defendants “actually made false demands or submitted false records” to anyone
• noting that every circuit to consider the issue has held that Rule 9(b) applies to FCA complaints

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).