Ritchey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that indictment for arson must allege value of property destroyed, because statute set punishment based on value
• same in arson prosecution because, “[i]n addition to imprisonment in the penitentiary, the guilty person is liable to a fine not exceeding double the value of the property destroyed”
• same in arson prosecution because, “[i]n addition to imprisonment in the peniten- tiary, the guilty person is liable to a fine not exceeding double the value of the property destroyed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Alleyne v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
• Southern Union Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 296×
• Garrett v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1887-02-18· cited 26×
• Kruger v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1893-12-22· cited 23×
• Emig v. Daum
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1891-04-16· cited 9×
• Wolf v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1876-05-15· cited 4×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1804-11-15· cited 15×
• State v. Peden
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1830-12-09· cited 3×