Ritchey v. Frazier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[sjince the record contains no evidence demonstrating appellee’s income as of the time of the agreed order, we cannot say that the chancellor’s decision that appellant failed to show that appellee’s income had increased since the entry of that order is clearly erroneous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2002-02-27· cited 27×
• Woodson v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1998-10-14· cited 15×
• Pannell v. Pannell
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1998-12-16· cited 9×
• McNamara v. Bohn
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2000-03-22· cited 6×
• Morehouse v. Lawson
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2006-03-08· cited 3×
• Moreland v. Hortman
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2001-02-07· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mikel v. Hubbard
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-05-23· cited 25×
• Roland v. Roland
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1993-08-25· cited 22×
• Ross v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1989-09-27· cited 13×
• Sugarloaf Development Co. v. Heber Springs Sewer Improvement District
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-03-06· cited 9×
• H & M Realty Co. v. Union Mechling Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1980-02-06· cited 5×