Rita v. Carella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a demand letter sent to one defendant was not effective against another defendant
• noting that a demand letter sent to one defendant is not effective as against another defendant
• overcharges in 16 violation of rent control ordinance recoverable under c. 93A
• tenants who brought action alleging landlord charged rent in excess of maximum lawful rent entitled to pursue G. L. c. 93A claim, which carried four-year statute of limitations, where one-year statute of limitations applicable to rent control ordinance had expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).