Skip to main content
· 5/10/2006

Rita L. Dicarlo v. R. James Nicholson

Citations

  • 20 Vet. App. 52
  • 2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 302
  • 2006 WL 1272355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Board lacks jurisdiction to make findings on issues that are not on appeal
  • holding that the concept or res judicata requires that there be only one valid decision on any adjudicated issue or claim
  • holding that the finality of a specific claim is an issue that can be raised when relevant, but is not a procedure or claim in and of itself
  • setting aside Board determination that was made outside of the Board’s proper review procedures for addressing the finality of a prior decision
  • setting forth various recognized exceptions to finality of decisions rendered by Secretary or Board
  • discussing the types of collateral attack authorized to challenge a decision by the Secretary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hagel, Kasold, Lance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.