· 5/10/2006
Rita L. Dicarlo v. R. James Nicholson
Citations
- 20 Vet. App. 52
- 2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 302
- 2006 WL 1272355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Board lacks jurisdiction to make findings on issues that are not on appeal
- holding that the concept or res judicata requires that there be only one valid decision on any adjudicated issue or claim
- holding that the finality of a specific claim is an issue that can be raised when relevant, but is not a procedure or claim in and of itself
- setting aside Board determination that was made outside of the Board’s proper review procedures for addressing the finality of a prior decision
- setting forth various recognized exceptions to finality of decisions rendered by Secretary or Board
- discussing the types of collateral attack authorized to challenge a decision by the Secretary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hagel, Kasold, Lance
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.