· 9/12/2002
Risteen v. Youth for Understanding, Inc.
Citations
- 245 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26227
- 2002 WL 31993982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiff had shown irreparable injury by demonstrating that he would not have access to \critical medical attention because he has lost his health insurance\
- finding that plaintiff had shown irreparable injury by demonstrating that he would not have access to “critical medical attention because he has lost his health insurance”
- noting the plaintiff’s diagnosis of congestive heart failure, possible pulmonary embolism, and necessary prostate surgery
- “The loss of health insurance benefits—particularly for those who are 14 unemployed—constitutes irreparable harm for purposes of a preliminary injunction.”
- “The loss of health insurance benefits – particularly for those who are unemployed – constitutes irreparable harm[.]”
- loss of health insurance benefits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.