Rispin v. St. Eleanora's Home for Convalescents

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that policy exclusions \are not to be extended by interpretation or implication but are to be accorded a strict and narrow construction\ and that any ambiguity will be resolved against the insurer
• holding that policy exclusions “are not to be extended by interpretation or implication but are to be accorded a strict and narrow construction” and that any ambiguity will be resolved against the insurer
• stating that exclusions “are not to be extended by interpretation or implication, but are to be accorded a strict and narrow construction” (internal citation omitted)
• stating that exclusions “are not to be extended by interpretation or implication, but are to be accorded a strict and narrow construction”
• stating that exclusions “are not to be extended by interpretation or implication, but are to be accorded a strict and narrow construction” (internal citation omitted)
• stating that insurer bears “heavy burden of demonstrating that there is no reasonable possibility of coverage under the policy” (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).