Ris v. Society for Savings (In Re Countdown of Connecticut, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether debtor received reasonably equivalent value when it gave a security interest worth $3,000,000 in its assets to a creditor was a question of fact not appropriate for summary judgment when it was unknown whether the debtor had pledged all of its assets
• \[S]ome disparity between the value of the collateral and the value of debt does not necessarily lead to a finding of lack of reasonably equivalent value\
• “[S]ome disparity between the value of the collateral and the value of debt does not necessarily lead to a finding of lack of reasonably equivalent value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).