Rippl v. Actavis Mid Atl., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in both trials and sentencing proceedings, “[t]he defendant . . . can present evidence, call witnesses, and cross-examine government witnesses”
• discussing the historical openness of sentencing hearings while analyzing the First Amendment right to a public trial
• using supervisory authority to vacate plea and sentencing proceedings held in robing room and remand for further proceedings to be held in public courtroom
• discussing the historical openness of sentencing hearings while analyzing the First Amendment right to a public trial
• \Access to sentencing proceedings-and to guilty plea proceedings-is particularly important because most cases do not go to trial.\
• \Access to sentencing proceedings-and to guilty plea proceedings-is particularly important because most cases do not go to trial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).