Skip to main content
· 1/15/1827

Ripitoe v. Hall

Citations

  • 1 Stew. 166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although the [Source Selection Evaluation Board] admits to considering the information received from [the awardee], as discussed here, this fact alone does not transform clarifications into improper discussions.”
  • also using a “substantial chance” test
  • using a “substantial chance” test
  • using a “substantial chance” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crenshaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.