Rios v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the filed rate doctrine barred claim for rescission on insurance policy because return for full amount of paid premiums would challenge the agency-approved rates
• concluding that the filed rate doctrine barred claim for rescission on insurance policy because return for full amount of paid premiums would challenge the agency-approved rates
• holding filed rate doctrine applicable because statutory scheme gave agency power to provide “meaningful review of rate increases”
• applying filed rate doctrine to common law claim seeking return of insurance premiums
• applying filed rate doctrine to common law claim seeking return of insurance premiums
• “[I]t would be more appropriate for the Court to address the commonality, i.e., conflicts of law analysis, during the class certification stage, after class discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).