Skip to main content
· 6/11/2007

Rios v. Nicholson

Citations

  • 490 F.3d 928
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13698
  • 2007 WL 1662319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that common law mailbox rule is for application
  • referring to the “known course of business” of the post office
  • mere statement that document in issue was never received is inadequate to rebut an applicable presumption of receipt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer, Dyk, Michel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.