· 6/11/2007
Rios v. Nicholson
Citations
- 490 F.3d 928
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13698
- 2007 WL 1662319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that common law mailbox rule is for application
- referring to the “known course of business” of the post office
- mere statement that document in issue was never received is inadequate to rebut an applicable presumption of receipt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Archer, Dyk, Michel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.