Skip to main content
· 5/30/2002

Rios v. City of Chicago

Citations

  • 771 N.E.2d 1030
  • 331 Ill. App. 3d 763
  • 265 Ill. Dec. 71
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 444
  • 2002 WL 1088176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In sum, none of defendant’s assertions cure the prejudicial evidentiary problems that arose during the trial of this matter and plaintiff is entitled to a new trial on that basis.”
  • “In sum, none of defendant’s assertions cure the prejudicial evidentiary problems that arose during the trial of this matter and plaintiff is entitled to a new trial on that basis.”
  • it was error to allow expert to rely on and disclose certain statements where no foundation was laid as to whether such hearsay is customarily relied on in rendering opinions in the expert’s field and whether such reliance was reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Theis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.