Rios v. Calhoon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, under the predecessor to Rule 20.1, that if no contest is filed, the appellant “is absolutely entitled to the exemption from costs, . . . and the trial court lacks the authority to affect the party’s entitlement”
• court on its own motion changed respondent from named appellate court to appropriate trial judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).