Rio Grande Underwriters, Inc. v. Pitts Farms, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there is no evidence that Congress intended to completely preempt state law claims against agents who sell reinsured crop insurance policies under the FCIA
• holding that the preemption regulation at issue here, 7 C.F.R. § 400.352(a), does not demonstrate an intent to completely preempt the field of crop insurance regulation
• finding no basis in the plaintiffs limited use of the crop insurance regulations to find a substantial federal question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).