Skip to main content
· 1/22/1977

Rinsley v. Frydman

Citations

  • 559 P.2d 334
  • 221 Kan. 297
  • 1977 Kan. LEXIS 216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Schulze holding was about requiring the defendant to file a motion for a more definite statement to rectify insufficient pleadings
  • recognizing tentative draft of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.