Skip to main content

Rino v. Mead

Citations

  • 2002 WY 144
  • 55 P.3d 13
  • 2002 WL 31133186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying the elements for establishing a professional malpractice cause of action in tort
  • “[E]xpert testimony is not required where the common sense and experience of a layperson are sufficient to establish the standard of care.” (citing Meyer v. Mulligan, 889 P.2d 509, 516 (Wyo. 1995)) (other citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, C.J., and Golden, Lehman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rino v. Mead

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.