Rinker Materials Corp. v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an argument that testimony of an economic expert was not competent because it was based on factual assumptions not supported by the record and noting that such argument would not be considered on appeal because no contemporaneous objection was made before the JCC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).