Rink v. Cheminova, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the specific causation experts’ testimony was “irrelevant” once toxicologist’s general cau- sation “foundational testimony” had been excluded
• recognizing that believability or persuasiveness remains an issue for the trier of fact
• noting that appellate court will defer to lower court’s reliability determination unless it is “manifestly erroneous”
• noting that the “task of evaluating the reliability of expert testimony is uniquely entrusted to the district court under Daubert”
• noting that the “task of evaluating the reliability of expert testimony is uniquely entrusted to the district court under Daubert”
• finding that because “summary judgment was properly granted as to the underlying claims of the class representatives, the issue of class certification is moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).